One
of the main causes of species extinction and loss of ecosystem
services – the benefits we derive from ecosystems to our life
quality – is habitat fragmentation, along with the introduction of
alien species, resources overexploitation, pollution, habitat
destruction and alteration. Fragmentation is when a large area of
habitat is broken into smaller and isolated patches, which become
surrounded by a different type of habitat (including urban or other
human-made habitats).
The most obvious effect of fragmentation is the
decrease in habitat amount. Then, how is habitat fragmentation
different than habitat loss? The difference is subtle: habitat
fragmentation requires isolated patches of habitat with various sizes
and varying isolation degrees between themselves. Although not
exclusively attributed to humans, habitat fragmentation has certainly
increased since the development of agriculture, as the latter
requires the clearing of vast areas of natural vegetation to grow
food.
When
habitats are fragmented, natural populations of animals and plants
are exposed to new and/or increased risks. First, a patch will very
likely contain a smaller population then a continue landscape would,
and the odds of going extinct to a small population are much higher
than to a bigger one. Fragmentation can also have long-term effects
like changing predation risks, the feeding habits of some animals,
and even their behavior, among others. But such risks depend
strongly on the species characteristics, such as if it is a large or
a small organism, how dependent it is on the native vegetation, and
how much the individuals of that species can move (disperse) between
the remaining habitat patches, among others.
What
we know about fragmentation comes especially from terrestrial
habitats. It is just natural that we try to learn what happens within
habitat patches when forests are transformed into plantations or
cities and all that is left behind are some patches of trees.
Figure 1: https://gardenerscoach.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/habitat-fragmentation/ |
Despite
the homogeneous appearance of the oceans, some studies have shown
that marine populations are being affected as well by human-caused
fragmentation. There is no forest as we know in terrestrial habitats,
but there are different kinds of vegetation and substrate, like
seagrass, kelp forests and coral reefs.
Figure 2: Kelp forest, https://www.nps.gov/cabr/learn/nature/kelp-forest.htm |
The removal of these
vegetation and substrates affects the population dynamics of marine
animals in a similar fashion to terrestrial organisms. For example,
juvenile crabs and fish use the seagrass as a refuge from predators,
so, the loss of seagrass cover and/or its fragmentation presents a
huge impact to the survival of these species. Seagrass fragmentation
can be natural, caused by waves, currents or animals, for example,
but when such fragmentation is caused by humans, the impacts are
usually stronger. By now you may be wondering how humans can fragment
marine environments: we do so by boating, fishing and by developing
the coast in inappropriate ways.
The
consequences of human-induced fragmentation go beyond the impacts on
crabs. Marine fragmentation can also affect the provisioning of
ecosystem services, such as fish production. The fragmentation of
tidal creeks, for example, has been shown to decrease the secondary production of
fish, which is the generation of biomass over a period of time, for
important fishing species in the Bahamas. Decreasing food
availability and survivorship of juvenile fish caused by
fragmentation were found as the main reasons for this drop of fish
production.
There are also examples of marine fragmentation by
wastewater (sewage effluents) and stormwater (runoff of highly
modified natural river basins).
In California, coastal pollution has been shown to limit larval
dispersal and population connectivity of a species of bat star, with
effects equivalent to habitat fragmentation. This is an important and
disturbing discovery, because it implies that even species with no
economic interest as a star bat are being strongly affected by human
development.
Figure 2: Bat star, from Puritzand and Toonen 2011 |
Only
few studies to date are focusing on understanding the human impact on
evolutionary processes of marine populations, and the findings are
still shallow. But the fact that these effects are occurring is
critical for thinking about fisheries management or for choosing
where to place a marine protected area. Besides, it is clear that we
cannot treat the oceans as a big dumpster for our sewage and runoff
if we are to maintain and protect reefs and seagrass for our own
future use of ecosystem services.
By Júlia Tovar Verba
No comments:
Post a Comment